Thursday, May 30, 2013

FOOD FOR THE GODS by KAREN DUDLEY - INTERVIEW

I JUST FINISHED READING Karen Dudley's Food for the Gods through Turnstone Press. It's such a fun read that I had to ask her for an interview. Hopefully, you'll find her answers both intriguing and illuminating, particularly if you like mixing light fantasy (comedy) with ancient history and Greek myth:

1). Karen, your book is set in ancient Greece where Dionysus and Hermes, as well as some of the other Greek gods are secondary characters to your protagonist. Why ancient Greece? And why these characters? What drew you to this particular setting?

I’ve loved the Greek myths since I was a kid so when I got to university, one of the first courses I took was Introduction to Greek Mythology. That led to a course in comparative mythology which was taught by the fabulous Dr. R.J. Buck. Dr. Buck was hands-down the best professor—the best teacher—I’ve ever had. And when you experience a truly gifted teacher, you want to take every course they offer, and that’s what happened to me. Dr. Buck taught Greek history, so naturally I took all his Greek history courses and in the process, I fell in love with ancient Greece. Dr. Buck was fond of telling us that there were no new stories under the sun, just different ways of telling old ones. So years later, when I decided I wanted to write an historical fantasy, the setting, the Greek gods, and even some of the plot came quite naturally out of his teachings.

2). The book shows that you’ve done a great deal of research to get the details of everyday life in ancient Greece just right. What were some of your sources? What are some of the things you found most interesting?

I’m one of those nerdy people who kept their university class notes—at least for the classes I loved—so I had those to start with. I did a lot of library research and found some really helpful sources, everything from a book about the debaucheries of Classical Athens (Courtesans and Fishcakes) to Ancient Athens on 5 Drachmas a Day (which is pretty much what it sounds like) to Siren Feasts: A History of Food and Gastronomy in Greece. I think the most interesting piece of information I found was in a book called Ancient Inventions in which I discovered that the Greeks were the inventors of bread dildos. Yes, that’s right. Bread dildos. I mean, really, how could I resist putting that particular tidbit in my book? I don’t think my writers’ group was ever the same after that submission!

3). Your main character, Pelops, is a celebrity chef. In the first couple of chapters, you reveal his unfortunate past, where, as a youth, his father served him in a stew to the gods at a feast. The gods resurrected him (save for his ivory shoulder) and have been embarrassed about it ever since. Is this part of the story based on an actual Greek myth, as other parts are? And why a chef?

Oh yes, Pelops and his rather unpleasant adolescence come directly from the Greek myth of Tantalus, who was Pelops’ father.  There are several variations of the myth about what Tantalus does. The one I chose to riff on (in which he kills Pelops and serves him to the gods for tea) is one of the more famous versions.

As for the chef bit...well, when I began working on the idea for the book, I thought I might make Pelops a student of Archimedes, the famous Greek engineer and inventor. I’ve always been fascinated by some of the cool inventions of ancient Greece, and I thought if I made Pelops an apprentice of Archimedes, I could write about them. I played around with this a bit, but somehow, it just didn’t feel quite right. And then one day, I was flipping through a book called The Life of Greece, when I came across a passage that said in ancient Athens when people wanted a special dinner, they couldn’t go to a restaurant because they didn’t exist yet, so what they would do was hire the services of a professional cook, who was usually a foreigner. That was my ‘Eureka!’ moment. I was already intrigued by the whole celebrity chef culture, and given what happens to Pelops with the whole getting-chopped-up-and-served-for-tea thing, making him a chef seemed to fit perfectly.

4). Your characters are a lot of fun. When creating the characters of Dionysus, Hermes, and Ares in particular, you make them stand-out, often in hilarious ways. When you build character, what goes through your mind? Do you base your characters on people you know? What were your thoughts in stepping away from the stereotype of what we think of, when we think of a specific Greek god?

With all my characters, I usually start out with someone I know, whether it’s a certain appearance or gesture, a way of walking or talking. But, of course, that’s just the start of it. Most of each character comes from me. Not sure what that says about me, but there you have it! I wanted the gods in my book to be fun. So often, the Greek gods are portrayed in movies as stiff and superior sorts, complete with snooty accents and white draperies and laurel wreaths on their heads. But when you read the myths, the gods were, shall we say, somewhat earthier than that, and that’s how I wanted to portray them. Not only is it more accurate, but it’s a lot more fun.

5). Your dialogue, especially among the lower Greek classes reminds me of working class Brits. A nice example of this is when Pharsalia the bread-wife says, “Now, don’t you worry your sweet self about it, luv. They’ll never hire the stupid sod, again. I should know, I was there, if you please.” I would never have thought of combining that style of speech with the ancient Greeks, but it’s fun and it works. What was your inspiration for the ‘pairing’?

You know, Susan, I honestly couldn’t tell you what my inspiration for that was. The characters just started talking to me in these crazy anachronistic voices and that’s how I wrote them. I do adore the movie A Knight’s Tale, however, so I suspect that the inspiration for it originated with that film.

6). You’ve interspersed the book with advertisements, ‘Sacrificing for Simpletons’ or ‘Dinner Parties for Dummies’ and recipes 'Pelop’s Roast Lamb with Plums', for example. These work quite nicely to foreshadow what’s coming. Some writers might have used these to augment what’s already occurred. What was your inspiration for using these?

Because I’m writing about an historical period that most readers might not be familiar with, I had to figure out a way to get certain information across without slowing down the narrative with the dreaded info dump. Years ago, I read a wonderful kids’ book published by Usborne called The Greek Gazette. Basically it was Greek history written as a tabloid. It was hilarious! I still have a copy of it. And when I started working on Food for the Gods and realized I needed to impart all this information without including it in the narrative, I decided to play with the Gazette idea and include stuff like advertisements and excerpts from self-help scrolls.

7). I love that you don’t hold back with making things miserable for Pelops, your main character. Did you ever have a moment where you wondered, how on earth am I going to get him out of this particular situation?

Oddly enough, I knew almost from the beginning how the book was going to end—I even wrote the last scene before I’d completed the first 70 pages!—so I knew things would come out right for him in the end. Having said that, I did put poor Pelops in some really nasty places. For that I have to thank Sheila Gilbert, an editor at DAW. I heard Sheila speak at KeyCon (Winnipeg’s local con) a few years back and she mentioned that the biggest problem most writers had was in doing—or, really, not doing—terrible things to their protagonists. Writers, she said, got too attached to their main characters and didn’t want anything horrible to happen to them; the result was always a bland, uninteresting book. After hearing this, I promptly went home and did terrible, terrible things to Pelops. I always knew how to get him out though because, let’s face it, I am rather attached to him!

8). You tell the story in First Person. I think it works really well, but why did you choose this particular POV?

My Robyn Devara mysteries are written in first person too, so it’s a POV that comes naturally to me. I did, however, make a conscious decision to use first person in Food for the Gods largely to better connect the readers with a setting which may be unfamiliar to them, but also to have them feel more like they’re part of Pelops’ stranger-in-a-strange-land experience.

9). How long did it take you to write the book, and how many revisions did you go through? Was there anything in the process that you learned about writing, when penning it?

I first got the idea years before I could actually do anything about it. I’d written the first fifty pages, but my publisher wanted another Robyn Devara book, so I had to shelve it. Then, in the middle of the Robyn Devara novel, we got a call from the adoption agency and I suddenly became a mum, so I had to shelve that book too!

I think the most educational thing that happened when I finally got the chance to write Food for the Gods was when I gave the first 100 or so pages to my publisher. The conversation went something like this:

Me: Here’s my new mystery! What do you think?
My publisher (after reading it): I think you’re writing a fantasy.
Me: What!?!

It was funny, but I was completely liberated by that insight! I’d been a bit blocked in terms of the story, but as soon as I knew I was writing a fantasy—as soon as I gave myself permission to write a fantasy—all kinds of interesting things were suddenly able to happen. I learned not to worry too much about categorizing what I’m writing and just to write the damn story. I can worry about what it is later. A valuable lesson!

10). Do you think the book reflects the writer? Do your books reflect you?

Absolutely! On both counts. I can’t tell you how many of my friends and family have told me that reading my stuff is just like hanging out with me. Hmmm...I hope that’s a good thing!

Thanks, Karen. It's a great book, everyone! Give it a read. And vote for it later - it's up for an Aurora!

You can find the link to the trade paperback here: Food for the Gods, by Karen Dudley through Turnstone Press at Amazon.com, or buy the e-book like I did for my Kobo Mini at Kobo: Food for the Gods, which saves paper and is even better!

Next Post: Do I Need a Publicist And If So, What Kind? Guest Post by Rachel Sentes of gal-friday publicity.

Stay tuned!

Thursday, May 23, 2013

NEW COMIC SERIES AT ON SPEC - THE LAST DIVISION AND FINAL FRONTIER, GUEST POST by CAT McDONALD

from The Last Division and Final Frontier by Kyle Charles
THE FOLLOWING IS A GUEST POST by Cat McDonald. I asked her to tell us about the latest thing happening at On Spec - COMICS! Here's what she says:

"Those of you who subscribe to On Spec have a treat coming soon. On Spec is running a comic! We’ve started working with the delightful Kyle Charles to bring you The Last Division, an eight-part story about heroism in the future of reality TV, told in Kyle’s slick, expressive comic style. I can’t tell you how excited I am that On Spec now has a space for comic artists.

The idea that speculative fiction in inherently 'un-literary' has stuck in my craw since I first heard it. My youth had been full of starry-eyed wonder at the classics of fantasy, and later, I broke my heart over 1984 and A Wizard of Earthsea. And yet, when I talked to others, I was as likely as not to hear the entirety of genre fiction roundly dismissed! In my college classes, fellow students wriggled with visible discomfort at the idea of “magic realism”. Orwell and Le Guin were ignored or dismissed as rare exceptions.

I have always been of the opinion that literature is not limited to memoirs and certain coming-of-age novels. To dismiss speculative fiction is to say, “Only those stories about the reality I know and understand are important,” - the working of a spectacularly limited mind. But then, while working at On Spec, I realized something. I had been saying something similar; “Only those stories that exist on my terms are important.” Speculative fiction is one thing certainly, but geek pop culture in general tends to be tarred with the same brush. Video games, blockbuster movies, TV series, comics, tabletop games - there were other media that I dismissed all too easily. Especially comics. Speculative fiction gets a bad rep all around, and there’s no good in just protecting the stuff that’s made purely out of words; our culture is much, much larger than that. Yes, some of it is just fluffy escapism, and some of it is callously commercial, but some of it is rich with truth and meaning, with feeling and beauty and every other sentiment we call literature. A true artist is a true artist no matter what the medium. 

 So, I suggested that we start running a comic, and volunteered to be the editor in charge of the project.  I put together a submissions call with the help of some friends in the local comic scene and got a good fistful of solid submissions. Some I liked, some I loved, some I seriously regretted having to reject, but only one I had to insist upon. Kyle’s proposal was exactly what I wanted; it was action-packed but intelligent, offbeat and sensitive. I loved starting our comic feature with a cyberpunk story because of the great literary pedigree the subgenre bears. Kyle also understood what I meant when I asked for a series of stand-alone short stories. The Last Division’s chapters are connected, but a reader can pick up any issue without having to feel like she’s getting someone else’s leftovers. 

So, pick up any issue of On Spec, starting with this spring’s issue, and you’ll be able to see Kyle at work. Once his contract is up, we plan to open for submissions again. I would love for literary, intelligent comics to be a permanent fixture of the magazine.

And you know what? If On Spec ever becomes capable of printing a video game, then I’ll take submissions for those, too."

Cat's Bio: Cat McDonald is a notorious troublemaker working in Edmonton, Alberta. She edits and designs for On Spec magazine, and her fiction can be read in Tesseracts Fifteen: A Case of Quite Curious Tales and Here Be Monsters: Tongues and Teeth. Currently, she’s trying to sell a weird western novel, madly researching organized crime history, learning to make chicken soup from scratch, and judging furry dance contests. She keeps busy.

Kyle's Bio: Kyle Charles is an Edmonton born and raised comic artist who still resides in the city. After graduating from visual arts post-secondary and completing his stint as Happy Harbor's Artist-in-Residence, Kyle has broken into the comic industry with upcoming work for Image Comics' '68: Hallowed Ground.

(Thanks, Cat and Kyle).

Next Post: Interview with Karen Dudley and her fantastic new fantasy, Food for the Gods. You might find some of the things she has to say surprising!

Stay tuned!

Friday, May 17, 2013

ME, MYSELF, AND I: A CLOSER LOOK AT ON SPEC EDITOR, SUSAN MacGREGOR

AND NOW IT’S MY TURN, to answer the questions I put to my fellow On Spec editors. I hope these posts are helpful and give writers a better idea of what we look for in submitted work: 

1). What kinds of stories appeal to you most? Do you lean towards a particular type of story or style? When I think in terms of what stories I want to see in On Spec, I think in terms of variety. Like some of my fellow editors, I prefer strong pieces told in a straightforward style, but I’m also as likely to choose prose that is more dense, more of a challenge to read, and—in my mind, more sophisticated in presentation. This also applies to point of view. I don’t prefer one POV over another. First Person works as well for me as Third Person Limited, Second Person, or (as long as it’s done extremely well), Omniscient. For me, variety is what it’s all about. I would hate for On Spec to be seen as one thing in terms of content or style. Differences in editorial taste mean a better selection for readers.

That said, I do have preferences. I love stories that make me laugh. We don’t get enough humor (and don’t tell me humor is hard to write. Like anything, you just have to know what works). I love fantasies set in historical settings in alternative or parallel worlds. I love pieces that mix genres, my personal favorites are Steam-punk and Weird West, but anything that’s unusual or new will catch my eye. Unlike Robin, I like a little romance thrown into the mix now and then, as long as the story stays true to its speculative nature.

Give me stories that are well-seasoned with vivid description, have a high emotional content and present characters who are quirky, passionate, and imperfect but not weak. Tell me a story where your protagonist wants something badly and risks a great deal to get it, where he changes as a result of succeeding or losing, and where I'm touched by his outcome (or entertained). 

2). What types of stories don't appeal to you? What are your pet peeves writing-wise? Characterization is so important. I hate weak characters—those who waffle, are acted upon without taking a stand, let cruel fate toss them around, or who bore me with unimportant detail (exposition). Think of who you'd like to chat with at a party. I don’t like Mary Sue protagonists who are sweet and good (a beginning writer’s mistake if there ever was one, but I’ve also seen the same thing done by authors who should know better). I don’t like unfeeling killers of any ilk, mostly because they’re uninteresting. Any brute can kill. If you want to have a protagonist like that, show me what makes him or her tick. Give me a reason to agree with what they do, even reluctantly. (Reluctantly might even be better).
.
I can’t stand redundancy. Here’s an example: ‘They looked with their faces towards the moon shining in the night sky.’  If you don’t know what’s wrong with that sentence, send me a note and I’ll enlighten you.

3). What advice would you give to a writer submitting to us? Write every day, if you can. A writer’s ability improves over time in a strange, organic way that’s hard to pinpoint. Get feedback on your work, preferably from someone who writes at a higher level than you. Don’t be afraid to experiment—try working in different styles or genres; they'll broaden you. Take risks! (Write humor!) Make all of your work vivid and emotional, and let the reader in on your protagonist’s deepest thoughts and motivations. Most important: put your work away for a time before submitting it anywhere. A month’s absence often makes the errors stand out. Great work takes time to become that way. Trust your inner editor. She's probably right about what isn't working or what more needs to be done.

4). Please list any credits you'd like mentioned (ie. book pubs, editing/publishing involvement), followed by a small bio: I've been an editor with On Spec Magazine for over twenty years (since 1991) making me a member of the ‘old guard’. I love editing for two reasons: one—it gives me a lot of pleasure to look at a story and help the writer bring it to greater strength, and two, for some reason, I seem to be really good at this. I'm not sure why. However, I do see things others might miss, including what isn’t in a story and what should be. I see what’s outside the box.

As for my credits, I’ve edited two anthologies: Divine Realms (through the Ravenstone Imprint of Turnstone Press), Tesseracts Fifteen: A Case of Quite Curious Tales (Edge Books). My non-fiction book, The ABC’s of How NOT to Write Speculative Fiction (The Copper Pig Writers’ Society) has seen two printings, and I am revising it a third time as I present each section in this blog. I have had my short fiction published in On Spec, Northern Frights Five, and other venues, as well as in anthologies, A Method to the Madness (Five Rivers Publishing), and The Urban Green Man (Edge Books). Currently, I am working on the first draft of my third book, The Tattooed Rose. The Tattooed Witch, the first in the trilogy (of the same name), has been nominated for an Aurora award through the Canadian Science Fiction and Fantasy Association. I released the second book, The Tattooed Seer, this August. All three books have been, or will be, published through Five Rivers Publishing.


Monday, May 13, 2013

CAN SELF-PUBLISHED WORK BE RE-SUBMITTED TO MAGAZINES AND ANTHOLOGIES?

I RECEIVED THIS LETTER FROM A WRITER the other day:

“I was wondering whether I could ask you an editorial/publishing-related question. (Of course!) As I get more organized in submitting my work to the speculative fiction markets, I realize I may have shot myself in the foot. A number of years ago, I self-published a short story (along with other people in my writing group) in a chapbook anthology. I want to submit it to anthologies and magazines, but I’m unsure whether I should be selling it as a reprint. The chapbook sold pretty well locally—about one or two hundred copies. In your opinion, does this count as being published for the purposes of selling first print rights? I’m assuming I can’t send it to anthologies unless they take reprints. But it wouldn’t affect first serial publishing rights for magazines, would it? I’d hate to think I made a bad decision by self-publishing my work before trying it in enough markets to get it published elsewhere first, but I’m afraid that's what I’ve done. Thanks for your time!”

First of all, I don't think self-publishing is necessarily a waste of your time. If you’re writing, you’re working on your technique, polishing and refining it. Self-publishing means you’re also learning how to promote your work—a requirement, no matter whether you’re self-publishing or working with an established publisher. The life of a writer is often frustrating. It can be good to create and celebrate your own successes.

According to Diane Walton, Managing Editor at On Spec, common wisdom says that if a writer makes his chapbook available privately online, say to his own critique group, it can still be a First North American Serial Rights story. The fact that it was published in a chapbook anthology and made available to the public means the story should only be sold for reprint rights. Unfortunately, First NA Serial Rights are affected. We won’t consider it at On Spec.

That said, we can’t speak for everyone. Your best bet is to query a specific publisher. Another option is to check out Douglas Smith’s website for his list of non-English markets around the world that take work published in English and translate it. Check it out here: http://www.smithwriter.com/foreign_market_list.htm.

Good luck!

Next Post: Me, Myself and I - I answer my own questions about what grabs me, and what doesn't, from the On Spec slush pile.

Friday, May 10, 2013

A CLOSER LOOK AT ON SPEC EDITORS: DIANE WALTON

And now to ask those same questions of our fearless leader, Managing Editor, Diane Walton. Diane is one of the original editors who gave birth to On Spec, way back in 1989. She has been the driving force behind the magazine for many years and manages to keep us all moving in the same  direction -- about as easy as herding gerbils. (Or raccoons, considering how some of us are a bit more feral. That's insider information. Buy me a drink at a con, and I'll tell you who's who.)

1). Diane, you’ve seen so many stories in the On Spec slush pile over the years. What kinds of stories appeal to you most? Do you lean towards a particular type of story or style?
                                                                             
I like stories with a powerful emotional ‘grab’. In other words, the protagonist has to go through a human experience (or ‘human-like experience’) that leaves me on the edge of my seat, wondering how they can possibly get past whatever life-changing event they’re encountering. The genre (SF, Fantasy, etc.,) takes a back seat to this.

2). What types of stories don't appeal to you? What are your pet peeves writing-wise?

I don't like self-indulgent First Person ‘Tell’ rather than ‘Show’ stories. It often lets an inexperienced author off the hook for having to show some kind of change in attitude or belief on the part of their protagonist. When it’s done poorly, all they do is observe. I also dislike ‘talking head’ stories. Something has to actually happen.

3). What advice would you give to a writer submitting to us?

We always suggest people should read a copy of On Spec to find out what we like. As much as I like to sell more copies, I’m not convinced this will give a writer any particular insight. So many authors write to us and insist their work will suit our style perfectly. That's for us to judge. My only advice is to learn to be more critical of your own work and ask yourself some serious questions: what is it about my protagonist that will compel a reader to keep turning pages? What would make them care?

4). Please list any credits you'd like mentioned (ie. book pubs, editing/publishing involvement) in a small bio:

Diane's Bio: Previously an author, my stories have been published on CBC Radio, in On Spec, Northern Frights and Divine Realms. I may even get back to writing some day, although I still enjoy reaping the rewards of being an editor. 

(And what an amazing editor, she is. She's the glue that holds us together. Thanks, Diane). 

Next Post: It should be about me answering the same questions, except I haven't written the post yet. Instead, next post will feature a letter sent to me about whether self-published work can be re-submitted to magazines and anthologies under First North American Serial Rights.

Stay tuned.

Tuesday, May 07, 2013

A CLOSER LOOK AT ON SPEC EDITORS: ANN MARSTON

AS I DID WITH ROBIN, BARB, AND BARRY, here are the same questions I put to Ann Marston. Ann has been a Fiction Editor with On Spec Magazine since 2009. She says she thoroughly enjoys being an editor:

1). What kinds of stories appeal to you most? Do you lean towards a particular type of story or style?

I really like space opera, good old-fashioned adventure stories where the heroes win spectacularly. However, what I'm looking for is a great story with a beginning, middle, and an end that works, with characters I can care for. I don't mind an anti-hero, but if the character is completely unappealing, I don't want to read about him, her, or it, and I really won't care about, "Yeah, but he gets what's coming to him in the end."

2). What types of stories don't appeal to you? What are your pet peeves, writing-wise?

I don’t like stories that contain foul language, violence and/or explicit sexual details that are put into the story merely to shock or disgust, rather than because they're integral to the story itself. I also don't like stories that wander aimlessly and end without any resolution of the problem.

Also, I become annoyed when I read a story where it’s obvious the author has not proofread it. When a story comes in full of grammatical and spelling mistakes, I always feel that if the author didn't care enough to make sure it was as readable as possible, why should I care enough to read it? Those who know me know I get a bit militant about never using "like" as a conjunction, and the lie/lay confusion.

3). What advice would you give to a writer submitting to us?

Write the best story you know how to write. Make sure it's a story, not just the outline of a great idea. We call those stories H.A.I.T.E. stories—Here's An Idea, The End. (If the prospect of what happens after your story ends is more exciting or intriguing that what happens in the story, it's a H.A.I.T.E.) Proofread your work. If you're not sure about something, look it up.

4). Please list any credits you'd like mentioned (ie. book pubs, editing/publishing involvement), followed by a small bio:

Ann's Bio: My publishing credits include six high fantasy books, Kingmaker's Sword, The Western King, Broken Blade, Cloudbearer's Shadow, King of Shadows, and Sword and Shadow, all published by HarperCollins Publishers and now reissued by Five Rivers Publishing as e-books. Kingmaker's Sword and Western King are now available as e-books or POD through Five Rivers, Amazon, etc., and Broken Blade will be available shortly. As well, two new books will be coming from Five Rivers once the Rune Blade series has been reissued. I've also had several short stories published, one of them in On Spec!

(Thanks, Ann.)  

Next Post: Diane Walton, On Spec Managing Editor

Stay tuned.
 

Saturday, May 04, 2013

A CLOSER LOOK AT ON SPEC EDITORS: BARRY HAMMOND

And now it’s Barry Hammond’s turn to answer my questions. If you’re a poet, sit up and take notice. Barry is our Poetry Editor and one of On Spec’s ‘old guard’. He has been with the magazine since 1991. (Wow, how time flies—twenty-two years!):

1). What kind of poetry appeals to you most, Barry? Do you lean towards a particular type of poem or style?

The type of poetry that appeals to me is generally when the writer has something fresh and original to say (or at least from an original viewpoint) and says it with a voice of their own and with style and brevity.

2). What types of poems don't appeal to you? What are your pet peeves, writing-wise?

My pet peeves are rhyming poetry and writers who try to use an 'antique' style of language from what they consider 'the olden days' —not any specific period.  I prefer writing in a contemporary or fairly neutral style.

3). What advice would you give to a poet submitting to us?

My advice is to read contemporary poetry and try to find your own voice.

4). Please list any credits you'd like mentioned (ie. book pubs, editing/publishing involvement), in a small bio:

Barry's Bio: I am a professional freelance writer and editor, based in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. My film, music, book reviews, interviews and writing on popular culture have most recently appeared on the Gig City website and have been in such diverse publications as The Edmonton Journal, Vue Weekly, See Magazine, Vex, Pacific Rim Review, Legacy and Independently Reviewed. I’m also a music, book, and DVD reviewer for Penguin Eggs (Canada's Folk, Roots, and World Music magazine). I’ve appeared as a guest on Booked.tv, an interactive television show in which mystery novels are deconstructed by both literary and actual crime experts. The show ran on Bravo, Book TV, CLT, Court TV Canada, and Access. My novel, Cold Front, was published with New American Library in 1982 and my short fiction and poetry have appeared in over fifty literary magazines and anthologies in three countries. I am the current Poetry Editor (and former Fiction Editor) for On Spec, Canada's Magazine of the Fantastic.

(Impressive, yes? I think so. You can read Barry's blog at: barryhammond.ca.Thanks, Barry.) 

Next Post: Ann Marston, Fiction Editor

Stay tuned. 

Wednesday, May 01, 2013

A CLOSER LOOK AT ON SPEC EDITORS: BARB GALLER-SMITH

As I did with Robin Carson, here are the same questions I put to Barb Galler-Smith. Barb has been a Fiction Editor with On Spec Magazine since 2008:

1). What kinds of stories appeal to you most? Do you lean towards a particular type of story or style? 

I especially like science-based stories and stories with realistic aliens who are not just people dressed up in rubber suits. A story can be either science fiction or space fantasy, but it must end with a positive emotional impact. I don't mean the end needs to be lovey-dovey or that the good guy wins; I mean that the end must be a logical one and it must satisfy, so I can say, "Yup, that's just right." As for style, I like it straightforward. Exquisite prose can woo me, but only if the story has a real engagement factor. A character without some kind of conflict that keeps him from getting what he wants will not work for me. I love getting to the end and saying, "Wow. That ended perfectly." I also like plot and characters in interesting settings. Lately, I've been drawn to stories based upon non-European myths. 

2). What types of stories don't appeal to you? What are your pet peeves, writing-wise? 

Most unappealing: stories with gratuitous violence, unnecessary gore, vulgarity (I will not read past the C-word unless it's in a context in which it's appropriatethat's never happened), or sexism, or racism for its own sake. I want a story, not a bunch of expletives that add up to nothing more than shock-value.

I am disappointed by stories that start strongly with a gripping first paragraph, and then back up to explain how the protagonist got where he was. If you need a back-story that's too big to tuck into the narrative, you're not writing a short story. I'm also not fond of present tense. If an opening is strong enough for me to read three or four paragraphs before I realize it's in present tense, the author has used it properly. Since I've been with On Spec, that's happened to me twice. 

Not so much a peeve is my desire for a complete story, usually with a middle. I hate HAITEs–Here’s An Idea, The End. Too many come across my desk. No development of plot or character means 'no sale' to me, no matter how well-written the story is.  Worse than that is a really good story that ends without a clear resolution. I'm left scratching my head and muttering, "WTF?"

3). What advice would you give to a writer submitting to us? 

Make sure we are the right market. Child protagonists are a hard sell to us, and we will never buy anything, no matter how fabulous, if it doesn't have at least a hint of a speculative element integral to the story.

Just tell the best story you can. Then make sure your punctuation and grammar are right. A lot of errors will get past me if I am engaged in the story, but there are a few things that will pull me out: wrong word usage, getting facts wrong (especially getting the science wrong), and too many fragments that suggest the author is unable to write a simple sentence.

4). Please list any credits you'd like mentioned (ie. book pubs, editing/publishing involvement), followed by a small bio: 

I've had a great working life: I've been a wildlife biologist, a librarian, a Humane Educator, a quarterly magazine editor, a science and language arts teacher, and a writer. I have both short and long fiction credits. My novels (in collaboration with US author Josh Langston) include an historical fantasy trilogy, The Druids Saga: "Druids" (2009), "Captives" (2011), and "Warriors" (forthcoming, August, 2013), through Edge Books Publisher, and, just for a change, a contemporary romantic comedy called "Under Saint Owain's Rock". 

Barb's Bio: Barb Galler-Smith loves all things science, living things, and history. And of course Shakespeare and her Super Spouse. They're all shiny.

(Thanks, Barb.)

Next Post: Barry Hammond, On Spec Poetry Editor

Stay tuned.